Standard terms and conditions (Ts and Cs) for the seller of goods to a business purchaser, for the sale and purchase of goods within the UK under a single order.
Read moreA business which sells goods to other businesses on a regular basis will likely require a pre-prepared set of contractual terms which it will seek to apply to its business transactions and dealings. A business purchaser of goods on a regular basis may also want to have its own set of Terms and Conditions which it would seek to apply to its purchases of goods.
Businesses will use Terms and Conditions for the following principal reasons:
Terms and Conditions will only apply to a contract if they have been incorporated into the contract.
In the absence of a signed contract which either sets out the Terms and Conditions, it is important that a seller or buyer (as the case may be) applies a consistent and practice in all pre-contract discussions and negotiations. This should include identifying in one’s own pre-contract documents, for example sales quotations or purchase orders, that your own Terms and Conditions will apply to any contract and to provide a copy of them. If the other party provides or refers to its own Terms and Conditions, for example in a buyer’s purchase order or a seller’s acknowledgement of a purchase order, the other party’s Terms and Conditions could apply if no objection or response is made to the effect that your own Terms and Conditions should apply.
If both parties insist on their own Terms and Conditions applying, the preferable solution is to try and negotiate the differences between the two sets of Terms and Conditions so as to reach a mutually acceptable position on the basis of one party’s amended Terms and Conditions.
The battle of the forms arises where both parties to the contract seek to apply their own Terms and Conditions. The answer to the question as to which should apply will generally depend on when the contract was concluded and whose Terms and Conditions had been incorporated into the contract at that stage. Often, this will be the party which last put forward its Terms and Conditions (assuming the other party had not expressly rejected them) – who has fired the “last shot”.
The sale of goods on a B2B basis is governed principally by the Sale of Goods Act 1979 (“SOGA”), in conjunction with the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (“UCTA”)?
Terms implied into a B2B contract for the sale of goods include:
Goods will be of satisfactory quality if they meet the standard that a reasonable person would regard as satisfactory, taking into account any description of the goods, the price (if relevant) and other relevant circumstances. Quality of goods include their state and condition and the following are aspects of the quality of goods (in appropriate cases):
The implied term as to goods being of satisfactory quality does not extend to any matter which makes them unsatisfactory:
Yes under UCTA, with certain exceptions and, for others, provided that the exclusion or restriction is reasonable.
For example:
The UCTA test of reasonableness, amongst other matters, requires regard to be given as to whether the non-breaching party knew or ought reasonably to have known of the existence and the extent of the term (having regard, among other things, to any custom of the trade and any previous course of dealing between the parties).
For Terms and Conditions for the supply of services to business clients, see
Under section 168 of the Companies Act 2006, shareholders can remove a director by passing an ordinary resolution at a general meeting. This decision cannot be made by written resolution. The shareholder proposing the removal must give formal notice to the company. The Articles of Association cannot override this statutory process or change the notice periods required for the process.
Once the company receives special notice, the board must call a shareholder meeting. This meeting must take place at least 28 days after the notice is received. The director facing removal has the right to submit written representations, which the company must circulate to shareholders before the meeting.
The special notice may also propose appointing a new director to replace the one being removed.
In some companies, weighted voting rights can protect shareholder-directors being removed from office by granting them extra votes on removal resolutions. This is common in joint ventures, multi-shareholder businesses, or investor agreements where director rights need protection.
Being removed as a director does not affect employment rights, but it may lead to legal claims, such as wrongful dismissal. If the removed director is also a shareholder, they may claim unfair prejudice under the Companies Act 2006 – particularly in quasi-partnerships, where they expected to be involved in management. If the claim succeeds, the court may order other shareholders to buy their shares at fair value.
£35.00 exc VAT
Updated by a lawyer on 04/11/2025
£35.00 exc VAT




Sample available