Contract Assignment

Contract assignment for the assignment of the benefit of a contract, in the form of a letter agreement between the outgoing party (assignor) and the incoming party (assignee).  Includes notice of assignment to be given to the other contracting party

Read more

When do I use this document?

  • for the assignment of the rights under a contract
  • for a contract which is governed by English law
  • on the basis that there is no restriction on the right to assign or that any restriction or condition to the right to assign the contract has been satisfied

What are the key features?

  • letter agreement between the assignor and assignee
  • assignment of rights under the contract
  • undertaking from assignee to perform the assignor’s obligations
  • indemnity from assignee for losses arising from the assignee’s failure to perform
  • separate notice of assignment to be signed by assignor and sent to remaining party, in order for assignment to take effect as a legal assignment

What else do I need to know?

The assignment of a contract is the transfer by one party to the contract (the assignor) of its rights under the contract to a person who is not an original party to the contract (the assignee).  Examples of when a contract might be assigned include:

  • the assignment of a contract on completion of a business purchase transaction
  • the transfer of the right to purchase property under an option agreement
  • the transfer of contractual warranties given under a building sub-contract to the owner of the building

Rights under contracts are, generally, enforceable only by the parties to the contract (referred to as privity of contract).  Under English law, the rights under a contract (the benefit of the contract) are assignable unless assignment is prohibited by the terms of the contract.  Certain contracts are however not assignable (for example, publishing agreements and car insurance policies), though this is generally not a relevant consideration in most commercial circumstances.

The express terms of a contract may however exclude or qualify the right of a party to assign the benefit of the contract.  Before entering into an assignment, the terms of the contract should be checked for any exclusion or qualification.

The exclusion or qualification might be:

  • absolute: no assignment by any party will be permitted unless the other party to the contract expressly consents to it at the time of the assignment
  • one way: one party’s right to assign is excluded or qualified whilst the other party’s right to assign is unrestricted
  • qualified: assignment requires the prior written consent of the other party, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed
  • intra-group: assignment to a company within the same corporate group as the assignor is permitted
  • permitted for the grant of security: a contracting party which has secured loan financing may be required to assign the benefit of contracts to the security holder under the terms of the debenture or other security document. If the contract prohibits assignment or permits it only with the prior consent of the other party, the assignment by way of security may be difficult to achieve

The legal assignment of a contract requires the following:

  • the assignment must be in writing and signed by the assignor
  • the assignment must be absolute (and not by way of charge only)
  • express notice of the assignment must be given to the non-assigning contracting party (the remaining party)

If the assignment takes effect as a “legal assignment”, the assignee has the right to enforce the assigned rights directly in its own name against the remaining party.

If the assignment is not a legal assignment, it will be an “equitable assignment” only, which means that the assignor will be required to join in legal proceeding with the assignee in order for the assignee to enforce the assigned rights against the remaining party.  There may be difficulties in achieving this, including if the assignor no longer exists for any reason.

What is the difference between an assignment and a novation?

The assignment of a contract will only amount to the transfer of the rights under the contract, known as the benefit of the contract.  The obligations under a contract, known as the burden of a contract, cannot be assigned.  If a party to a contract wants to transfer both the benefit and the burden of a contract, the contract will need to be novated.

Under a novation, the contract is replaced with a new contract and the new party to the contract is treated as an original party to the contract in place of the departing party.  Novation requires the consent of the other party to the contract and is documented in a novation agreement or deed of novation between the three parties.

An alternative to the novation of a contract is for the performance obligations of the contract to be sub-contracted to a third party.  In the absence of an express term which prohibits sub-contracting, one party to a contract (the sub-contracting party) may sub-contract its performance obligations to a third party (the sub-contractor).

A sub-contract is the agreement between the sub-contracting party and the sub-contractor.  However, a sub-contract does not discharge the liability of the sub-contracting party to the other party under the underlying contract to whom the obligations are owed.  If the sub-contractor fails to perform, the sub-contracting party may have a claim against the sub-contractor but will remain liable to the other party under the underlying contract for the failure of performance of the sub-contracted obligations.

What other documents are available?

For a template novation agreement, see

When do I use this document?

  • to sub-divide issued shares into a larger number of shares
  • to consolidated issued shares into a smaller number of shares
  • typically, on closing of an investment transaction or in connection with an issue of new shares
  • if the resolution is to be approved at a general meeting, in conjunction with our template general meeting notice Shareholder meeting notice

What are the key features?

  • ordinary resolution to be passed as a written resolution
  • alternative forms of the resolution depending on whether the issued shares are being sub-divided or consolidated

What else do I need to know?

A private limited company can alter its share capital in various ways, including:

  • sub-division: sub-dividing issued shares into shares of a smaller nominal amount
  • consolidation: consolidating issued shares into shares of a larger nominal amount

Other types of share capital alteration include the allotment of new shares, reduction of capital, redemption or purchase of own shares and converting issued shares into shares of a different class.

Why would a company sub-divide shares?

Companies are often incorporated with a small number of ordinary shares.  If the company plans to issue new shares, such as during an investment round, it may need to sub-divide the existing shares so that the numbers and percentages align with the investment terms.

For example, a company incorporated with 2 shares of £1.00 each will need to sub-divide them if it receives investment for 20% of the enlarged share capital. 

To achieve the correct percentage shareholdings, one way of doing this would be to sub-divide the existing 2 shares of £1.00 each into 4 shares of £.0.50 each.  The investor could then subscribe for 1 share of £0.50 and would own 1 out of the 5 shares in total, equal to 20% of the enlarged share capital.

Another idea would be to sub-divide the existing shares into a much smaller nominal share value as this will facilitate future shares issues and share transfers.  

How does a company sub-divide its shares?

Sub-dividing shares requires an ordinary resolution of shareholders unless the Articles of Association exclude or restrict this.  If such exclusions or restrictions exist, the Articles must be amended by special resolution to disapply the exclusion or restriction.  After passing the ordinary resolution, the company will need to file Companies House Form SH02 within one month.

Why would a company consolidate shares?

Share consolidation is the reverse of sub-division, where a specified number of existing shares are consolidated into a single share or fewer shares.

Private limited companies are less likely to carry out a consolidation than a public company, which may do this to increase its traded share price or perhaps to reduce the number of shareholders on its register.

If a private company wished to consolidate its share capital, this requires an ordinary resolution of shareholders, unless the Articles of Association exclude or restrict this right.  After passing the ordinary resolution, the company will need to file Companies House Form SH02 within one month.

Explanatory Guides

As with all of our document templates, your purchase will include access to clear explanatory guidance on the document and its use.

Updated by a lawyer on 05/01/2023

Create your document in 3 Easy Steps
Amanda | Bannister Creative
“It’s hard to find legal documents on the internet you can really trust. Knowing an expert lawyer has drafted what I need, gives my business the edge and gives me peace of mind.”
Elle, Founder | Winslow skincare & aesthetics.
“As an SME Paperrock saves us the legal fees we’ve previously had to spend. In these challenging times that's a big help. Great products and support.”
Giles, MD | Boniti Ltd.
Shopping Basket

Sample available